Aspals Reading List

Return to Home Page

Military Legal Publications





Bottom of Page  bottom of pageBottom of Page


Please pass on information about sources and links which you consider of interest and relevance. Hot links are provided to web sources.
The cited references do not signify agreement by
Aspals with their content (see the Disclaimer).
An item marked ***New*** means new to the list. Copyright © remains with the author.

For any titles not appearing in the Lists, please use the search box to find them.

The Lists: See the Aspals Archive     Search the Aspals Lists

Last Year's List

Contact Aspals
Date Title Author Reference
***New***
January
Was NATO’s eastward expansion a broken promise? Offiziere.ch Officiere,
December 28, 2018
It is not just Russian President Vladimir Putin who has accused the western NATO members of having deceived Russia about their plans for NATO's eastward expansion. Discussions of the strained relationship between Russia and NATO often turn to how NATO's eastward expansion in 1999 and 2004 broke a promise made to the Soviet Union in the negotiations that led to of German reunification. Judging whether NATO's extension beyond its 1991 borders represents a broken promise or agreement is a fundamental moral assessment of the defense alliance. Declassified documents clearly show that Gorbachev was repeatedly verbally assured that NATO would not expand eastwards. Both in national jurisdiction and international politics, verbal promises and agreements can also acquire legal validity. Even legally non-binding agreements are regarded as essential instruments in international politics.
The question remains, however: Could Russia assume on the basis of Western assurances that NATO would not extend its sphere of influence further east? To what extent was NATO's eastward expansion a broken promise or even a breach of an agreement? Following NATO's eastward expansion, Russian confidence in the intentions of Western states was damaged by its operation 'Allied Force' and the new strategic concept. This did not change even after 1999: further rounds of enlargement (e.g., plans to accept Ukraine and Georgia as NATO member states) and the advanced US missile defense shield further undermined relations with Russia. Russia had no real voice in the negotiations with either the US or NATO. Only one thing has changed: with the election of Putin in 2000, Russia set off once again on its nationalist path, full of self-confidence.
Summary extracted by Aspals

Return to TopofPage

Copyright © Aspals Legal Pages 1997-
Please report problems to webmaster@Aspals.com
Go to previous page

The Lists: See the Aspals Archive

Back to Top